Tax Return admin on 04 Aug 2008 02:19 am
Taxpayers Pay Corporate Debts
But I first began thinking about this in a slightly different vein, given what is happening in the west. For those who do not know the situation in the west of this – there is the collapse of the financial system and the state actively manipulates markets and laws to save this business. If you do not go into details, the authorities are going to compel U.S. taxpayers to pay damages of financial giants.
The situation in Russia and the U.S. on the one hand different, but on the other the same. Different in the sense that we have chosen will be business money, which will then (bad) spent on the people. At all these ostentatious national projects and raising military salaries. In the United States will finance a different direction – on the people hanged hundreds of billions of dollars bailouts.
But equally that there are hierarchical relationships between government and business, which should not. Between government and business should be relations between the neighbours. It is better when they just politely greet and do not make any shit to each other. If they are friends and help each other – that is, generally speaking idyll. If the quarrel – then it is bad. But between the neighbours have no hierarchical relationship. I do not tax my neighbors and they do not rudder me.
Just as religion should be separated from the state, business and the state should also be selected. If they are not individual – it is precursor problems. All we talk about the fact that “business should not climb into politics” – a profanation. Our business is preparing clearly subordinate, rather than an independent position.
The situation where business rules the state – all this we see in the U.S. – is no better. While it may be better in a certain term, but still the U.S. political system – a profanation of clean water, and the economy – a continuous hypocrisy. Talking about competition, the market and so on, and actually massive subsidies from the state – from farmers to Boeing.
I am confident that the tandem state and business – regardless of who’s on the top, and who’s at bottom - always strikes the population. To stay in business abnormally hierarchical relations with the state. To be honest, the western system scares me even more than ours.
For the first time I did not go beyond the thought that business – that’s cool and excellent. If you remember, a few months ago I have couple of posts that business is not just white and fluffy that it often and deception. More recently I wrote about senselessing rights in the system and “soulless” corporation.
But especially frightens me to splice state and business, as a means of violence. We constantly write about raiding when business with the help of the power authority selects something. But few who writes about raiding west, where business controls a significant portion of the state.
When can adopt a law on which one copy songs will be punished by a fine of 10 thousands bucks. Or adopt a law on which to declare themselves bankrupt becomes very problematic. Or the law on which the business will be very minor responsibility. Or simply remove all the rules to steal money from Elaeagnus under the guise of “investment” was simply easier. But the supreme way, as I already wrote, is when corporate debts hang on taxpayers. Wall Street Financier come up with an interesting pattern as to share with the people. They are taking ourselves income and losses give people. All “at the fair”.
But I always adhered to a different view – the farther from the state, the better.
And that you think about this?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.